free hit counter

header image

Anti-Porn PSA From the 1960s…

Pravachol Dosing Proventil Asthma Inhaler Manufacturer Protonix Versus Nexium Nature S Bounty Coral Calcium Adderall Aciphex Zoloft Heartburn Will Clomid Disrupt Natural Ovulation Kidney Stones Topamax Aciphex Jokes Injecting Crushed Ultram Prozac Headaches Hgh With 2-aep R Lite Brite Cube Melatonin Specifications Labelling Zoloft Birthday Coumadin Therapy Diet Allegra Odt Celexa Memory Loss Duration Breast Augmentation Waterfall Medicine Dilantin How To Stop Taking Atacand Ofloxacin Metronidizole Cipro Uti Pid Flonase Pregnancy Levitra And Nancy Bryan Actos Diabetes Pill How Does Zetia Work Effexor Official Eye Problems With Viagra So Cla Mountians Gabapentin Celebrex Who Makes Generic Inderal Post Op Breast Augmentation Uneven Swelling High Eosinophils Singulair Synthroid In Depression Treatment Anaerobic Infection Atrophic Rhinitis Zithromax Side Effects Neurontin Diflucan Ingredients Zithromax For Bladder Infection Beluca Coumadin Enzyme Depakote And Hiccups Super Enhanced Coral Calcium Cipro And Sinus Infections Finger Rub Melatonin Lasix Blood Prozac Worst Side Effects Breast Augmentation Gone Bad Is Viagra For Me Xeloda Adverse Side Effects Seeger Weiss Fosamax Video Of Flomax Soma Asset Management

 Simply amazing “Anti-Porn” PSA from the 60s… It starts out like any PSA would or should, but as it progresses, the images it shows are more suited for fans of porn than opponents of it. Just look at the scene where a farm girl lies prostrate with a billy goat visible in the background, bestiality anyone?

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

Of Interest

Post meta

This entry was written by Picaros and posted on July 22, 2007 at 11:27 am and filed under North America. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment(Latest is displayed first) or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Share with others

Post Anti-Porn PSA From the 1960s… to digg. Post Anti-Porn PSA From the 1960s… to Reddit add to stumbleupon Google Bookmark myweb bookmark on del.cio.us newsvine Tailrank magnolia Furl co.mments shadows simpy blinklist

17 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

  1. as long as men judge women as objects… as long as women measure wallets… porn is necessary… plus i like MILF porn best!!

    1. pornloverhater on July 25th, 2007 at 11:05 pm

  2. GOOD OL’ George Putnam (the narrator)
    TV news anchor, Radio Talk host
    now 92 years old,
    he always rode his Palamino horse in
    the yearly Pasadena Rose Parade, now
    still going strong on
    www.cableradionetwork.com

    2. Video Louis on July 25th, 2007 at 5:54 am

  3. These are mostly just pictures of naked people. Porn is in the mind. They may make it easier to use your mind for pornographic purposes.

    3. William on July 25th, 2007 at 12:31 am

  4. i think there is some merit to the idea that muscle mags subtlely promote homosexuality. and lord knows that pornography does pervert you and undermines your ability to enjoy healthy sexual relationships. you get so used to seeing these hot models with giant breasts and everyone else starts to look a little more blah. there was a day that women, too did not have to obsess so much over their looks to the detriment of their personality or character development. yeah, i think there is something to the idea that all this stuff made us a little too sex-crazy. what used to be sacred and behind closed doors is now in your face all of the time and distracts you from what you should really be paying attention to.

    4. blake on July 24th, 2007 at 11:58 pm

  5. Ha stupid americans!

    5. Tom Hustler on July 24th, 2007 at 8:52 am

  6. No one stands up for porn! Porn is FUN!

    6. Freddy Finger on July 24th, 2007 at 6:19 am

  7. No one stands up for porn. Porn is FUN!

    7. Freddy Finger on July 24th, 2007 at 6:14 am

  8. Wow, what foresight. If they saw Jerry Springer and Maury back then, there would be riots in the street. Thats how evil destroys us, a little at a time.

    9. Ian on July 24th, 2007 at 1:39 am

  9. after that commercial the sales of these magazines just rise up

    10. okaar on July 23rd, 2007 at 9:59 pm

  10. We need more advertisement of these type TODAY!!!!!

    11. average_person on July 23rd, 2007 at 9:12 pm

  11. Wow! I’m turned on!

    12. darkman on July 23rd, 2007 at 9:03 pm

  12. Good ol’ George Putnam. He was a newscaster on independent stations in the Los Angeles area in the ’60s and ’70s. He probably served as the model for “Ted” on the Mary Tyler Moore show. (Wikipedia for those under 30. 8) He was such a buffoon, always good for a laugh. Then he collaborated with Mort Sahl on a show called “Both Sides Now.” It was intended to be a point-counterpoint sort of thing. But with two comedians, one conscious of the comedy and one not, it was entertainment of the highest order. The interesting thing was, you got to see more of George than just his bombastic “editorials” or his reading of thevnews with in-character pronouncements on the stories. On BSN, you saw George engaged in debate and discussion in an unscripted environment with Mort Sahl, and partisans of both men in the audience. And along with intentional and unintentional humor, I began to see something remarkable: George Putnam had a tender heart. He was wounded by the contempt and laughter of his adversaries. Not only that, it was clear that he was sincere in the beliefs he propounded. (In the paranoia of the times, nobody on the left believed anyone on the right could truly believe anything they were saying. The reverse was true too, of course. Come to think, that’s largely true today.) George quit the show in a huff after three shows, because Mort dominated them with Kennedy conspiracy stuff. When he came back, the show had a more balanced format that it retained for the rest of its run. Over that time, I saw one other surprising thing occur: George Putnam started to wise up on a few things. He didn’t convert to the other side, but he grew a little bit through his debates with Mort. This was the most surprising thing of all, given what had seemed to be his implacable hard right beliefs and impenetrable stupidity during his career up to that point.

    13. Howard Owen on July 23rd, 2007 at 3:22 pm

  13. Careful, you could be accused of hosting child pornography within this video.

    14. ob1 on July 23rd, 2007 at 2:24 pm

  14. i hate christians

    15. ben on July 23rd, 2007 at 2:08 pm

  15. Awww, that guy was just sore because he didn’t want to admit he liked it. :P
    Thank the Lord for lesbianism!

    16. Aunt Izzy on July 23rd, 2007 at 1:40 pm

  16. It just goes to further prove the government propaganda machine is always working and why the internet is the best thing to happen. Ever. Information can be processed and accessed instantly and it will be hard for them to ever lie to us and get away with it. Don’t let them regulate the internet.

    http://beanbagging.com

    17. Beaned on July 23rd, 2007 at 10:25 am

  17. Well I believe this was the whole idea behind most movements back in the 50 and 60s including the womens lib movement (Google Gloria Steinem, woman’s lib and CIA). Even the CIA admits the co-opting of almost all large movements in order to give the impression of promotion or opposition to certain ideas. But through images, double think, action or inaction, purposely undermined the message so that nothing was accomplished or even the opposite promoted. To me this video is obviously meant to promote sexuality, not condemn it. The idea was, and still is, to break down American morals so that infiltration of America by foreign ideas and operatives became easier. The CIA is not our friend, as much as we’d like to think so. Nice vid.

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&hs=Euc&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=cia+woman%27s+lib+gloria+steinem&spell=1

    18. TIm on July 23rd, 2007 at 8:16 am

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*